When a new SSL session is created, everything works fine. We have analysed the issue and below are the things we have observed : Its like may be after 4 or 5 times when we refresh the page, the wss connection happens once. However at time the wss connection does happen. The connection also has stopped happening on Firefox. We use Amazon EC2 Medium ServerĮvery thing was working fine till last week when suddenly the chrome browser started showing failed: Error during WebSocket handshake: net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET. We have built our own websocket server in PHP and use Stunnel for using secure websockets. Stunnel 4.56 on x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu platformĬompiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.We have made an application that using websockets.
![stunnel timeoutclose stunnel timeoutclose](https://developers.exlibrisgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/alma/integrations/ASRS_Stunnel_Config_Page-768x350.png)
Stunnel timeoutclose how to#
Here is the version of stunnel installed in case that matters for the executables support, I keep wondering if this version works from systemd if I found out how to do it right? **stunnel -version** Disable support for insecure SSLv2 protocol Key = /etc/pki/tls/private/managed_cert.key Certificate/key is needed in server mode and optional in client modeĬert = /etc/pki/tls/private/managed_cert.pem Chroot jail can be escaped if setuid option is not used
![stunnel timeoutclose stunnel timeoutclose](https://developers.exlibrisgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/3m_self_check1.png)
How should the unit socket/service files be named for each instance?Ĭonfigs below are based on the other article's recommendation:Ĭat /etc/systemd/system/stunnel-webmin.socket: ĮxecStart=/bin/stunnel /etc/stunnel/nfĬat /etc/stunnel/nf: chroot = /var/lib/stunnel I kept getting errors about permissions for the PID file regardless of the settings I used, should I still be doing a PID method?
![stunnel timeoutclose stunnel timeoutclose](https://developers.exlibrisgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/stunnel-config3.png)
Should I be forking instead of running separate type=simple? I can't seem to find the right search to enter to find an example to replicate from.Ĭould someone please point out the probably dumb mistake I keep making and provide a working solution to run these instances of stunnel?Ĭan I run separate instances of stunnel using type=simple like you can with forking? I read through the mentioned post and tried it the proposed way using a socket and a service template, but I don't completely understand it and I still keep getting error messages about not being able to find/start the service. My goal is to be able to run multiple separate instances of stunnel as SSL frontends for various applications on the local server, such as one for webmin, one for Kibana, one for something else. I have been trying the method from another post on this forum, but cannot make it work or configure it correctly:
Stunnel timeoutclose trial#
After many hours of trial and error and much Googling, I cannot make stunnel run using systemd on CentOS 7.